<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Memory Leak &#187; How-To</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foobert.com/blog/tag/how-to/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foobert.com/blog</link>
	<description>That which fades into the ether.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 20:49:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Building pannier hardmounts for a BMW F800</title>
		<link>http://www.foobert.com/blog/2009/05/21/building-pannier-hardmounts-for-a-bmw-f800/</link>
		<comments>http://www.foobert.com/blog/2009/05/21/building-pannier-hardmounts-for-a-bmw-f800/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 16:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[How-To]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motorcycle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aluminum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMW F800ST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DIY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panniers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foobert.com/blog/?p=268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The thought of spending over $1k for the BMW panniers (that aren&#8217;t even water proof) is totally absurd to me. Other aftermarket options add up to &#62;$700+ by the time you buy the special F800 adapter frame for them.  I guess I just couldn&#8217;t justify such expense for something that will only get put on the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thought of spending over $1k for the BMW panniers (<a href="http://f800riders.org/forum/showthread.php?t=26785" target="_blank">that aren&#8217;t even water proof</a>) is totally absurd to me. Other aftermarket options add up to &gt;$700+ by the time you buy the special F800 adapter frame for them.  I guess I just couldn&#8217;t justify such expense for something that will only get put on the bike a few times a year.</p>
<p>Soft bags can be had for very reasonable prices, but, the attachment straps are questionably secure and the paint abrasion/scratching from the bags moving with the bumps and wind is totally unacceptable.  This left me with just one other option &#8212; spend some time build my own pannier racks to hold soft bags.</p>
<p>I found some <a href="http://www.ortliebusa.com/CartGenie/prod-59.htm" target="_blank">waterproof Ortlieb saddle bags</a> rated at 47L. It has a &#8220;drybag&#8221; style  roll top, and semi rigid plastic shell on 4 sides. The fabric is heavy rubberized material &#8212; definitely waterproof.</p>
<p>First a shot of the finished product.<br />
<img src="http://foobert.com/linked/2009/DSC_1652.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>The frame is constructed from 1/8&#8243; aluminum stock.  Each side bolts using 2 bolts: the bolt in the side of the factory luggage rack to support the factory panniers and one bolt that holds a bracket around the lower luggage rack support.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the upper bolt attachment. Note that the bolt goes through from the inside the bag, through the internal support frame and into the luggage rack. The three small bolts attach the square stiffener tube a piece of flat stock that makes up the internal framework (not removed when the bags are removed).<br />
<img src="http://foobert.com/linked/2009/DSC_1646.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>The primary part of the lower attachment is 2 pieces of 1.5&#8243; angle stock bolted together to make an upside-down &#8220;U&#8221; shaped piece. One face of the &#8220;U&#8221; bolts to the inside of the pannier, and the other side of the &#8220;U&#8221; is used to attach to the lower luggage rack.  The &#8220;U&#8221; is wider at the front and narrow at the back in order to define the angle that keeps the bag from rubbing on the plastic under the saddle and to keep it from rubbing on the upper luggage rack at the rear. Not that this angle means the total width of the panniers is widest at the front, and narrower at the rear &#8212; which is fine with me as it keeps the weight hugged in as close to the center of the bike as possible. (please overlook my chicken strips <img class="inlineimg" src="http://f800riders.org/forum/images/smilies/icon_smile_blush.gif" border="0" alt="" />)<br />
<img src="http://foobert.com/linked/2009/DSC_1648.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>The lower luggage rack attachment was the most challenging part of the design and I ended up throwing out the prototype and doing a second design here. The square tube is pop riveted to the inner face of the inner &#8220;U&#8221; shape and it supports the weight of the bags by resting on the top of the factory luggage frame.  Note that the pop rivets only hold things together when it&#8217;s detached &#8212; the attachment bolt is the primary fastener for strength.  Then, another piece angle stock is bolted to the inside of the square tube to capture the factory luggage frame on all sides.<br />
<img src="http://foobert.com/linked/2009/DSC_1642.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>And another angle of the lower luggage frame attachment point:<br />
<img src="http://foobert.com/linked/2009/DSC_1640.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>A wider shot of the lower attachment point. Note that the bit of angle stock hanging down is a heat shield to keep the heat of the muffler off the bag.<br />
<img src="http://foobert.com/linked/2009/DSC_1638.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>And, here&#8217;s another shot giving a good reference to the clearances to the luggage rack and the side plastic under the saddle.<br />
<img src="http://foobert.com/linked/2009/DSC_1645.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>Not shown is the fact that the upper &amp; lower exterior frames are connected by means of a piece of flat stock on the inside of the bag connecting to 2 vertical pieces of angle stock at the front and back corners of the bag (all on the inside). This adds total rigidity to the system. There are no other straps/velcro needed to hold the bags on the bike &#8212; only the 2 bolts mentioned above.</p>
<p>So far, I&#8217;ve had them overloaded for an 1100 mile trip there&#8217;s been no issues.<br />
<strong><br />
Update</strong></p>
<p>Since I&#8217;ve gotten a request for more info, here&#8217;s the cut-list of each part. All dimensions are in inches:</p>
<table>
<tr>
<td>#</td>
<td>Part name                    </td>
<td> Material                    </td>
<td>Length  </td>
<td>Quantity</td>
<td> Total</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>Lower Truss                  </td>
<td> 1.5 x 1.5 x 0.125 Angle     </td>
<td>  12.75 </td>
<td>2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>Angled Attach Truss          </td>
<td> 1.5 x 1.5 x 0.125 Angle     </td>
<td>  7     </td>
<td>2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>Luggage frame retainer</td>
<td> 1.5 x 1.5 x 0.125 Angle     </td>
<td>  4     </td>
<td>2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
<td>                             </td>
<td> 1.5 x 1.5 x 0.125 Angle     </td>
<td>        </td>
<td>        </td>
<td>47.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>Luggage Frame rest           </td>
<td> 0.75 x 0.75 x  0.0625 Square</td>
<td>  4.5   </td>
<td>2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>Upper Stiffener              </td>
<td> 0.75 x 0.75 x  0.0625 Square</td>
<td>  9.75  </td>
<td>2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
<td>                             </td>
<td> 0.75 x 0.75 x  0.0625 Square</td>
<td>        </td>
<td>        </td>
<td>28.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>6</td>
<td>Interior Vertical support    </td>
<td> 0.75 x 0.75 x 0.125 Angle   </td>
<td>  6.875 </td>
<td>4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
<td>                             </td>
<td> 0.75 x 0.75 x 0.125 Angle   </td>
<td>        </td>
<td>        </td>
<td>27.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>7</td>
<td>Upper Horizontal support  </td>
<td>1.5 x 0.125 Flat             </td>
<td>  14.625</td>
<td>2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>8</td>
<td>Exterior Vertical support    </td>
<td>1.5 x 0.125 Flat             </td>
<td>  4     </td>
<td>4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
<td>                             </td>
<td>1.5 x 0.125 Flat             </td>
<td>        </td>
<td>        </td>
<td>45.25</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p style="text-align: left;">
The following pictures detail what the pannier frame looks like without the Ortlieb bag.  <strong>All pictures below are taken of the right-side frame.  </strong></p>
<p>As if it&#8217;s not obvious, the numbered parts correspond to the part number in the cut-list above.
</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<img src="http://foobert.com/linked/2009/20100216212703_DSC_5710-Edit.jpg" width=900 height=565/><br />
<span style="color: #999999;">NIKON D70, ISO 800, ƒ/2.8, 1/25sec, 38mm focal L.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">
If you want the top of the bag to be tucked in a little tighter, you might wish to change the part #5, Upper Stiffener to use angle stock instead of the square tubing.  This would tuck the top of the frame about 3/4&#8243; closer toward the center of the bike.
</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<img src="http://foobert.com/linked/2009/20100216212758_DSC_5711-Edit.jpg" width=900 height=569/><br />
<span style="color: #999999;">NIKON D70, ISO 800, ƒ/2.8, 1/50sec, 29mm focal L.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">
Below is a detail of the lower luggage rest.  Ideally, if it is constructed correctly, this square tube bears the majority of weight of the bag by resting on top of the bike&#8217;s luggage frame. Thus, the top pin/bolt is not under significant sheering moment and should mostly be in tension.  Achieving this goal requires carefully locating the bolt hole for the top bolt threaded into the bike&#8217;s luggage rack.
</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<img src="http://foobert.com/linked/2009/20100216213006_DSC_5712.jpg" width=900 height=453/><br />
<span style="color: #999999;">NIKON D70, ISO 800, ƒ/2.8, 1/40sec, 29mm focal L.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">
Below is the detail of the luggage frame retainer.  This captures the bikes luggage frame on all 4 sides, giving a solid lower mounting point.  The slot in the retainer piece is milled out to make room for the &#8220;tab&#8221; welded to the inside of the luggage frame. The tab is perfect to keep the lower mount from sliding fore/aft on the frame.</p>
<p>I cut the slot by drilling many holes along the path, and then using a dremel tool and file to clean it up. Those with access to a milling machine will make fast work of the slot.
</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<img src="http://foobert.com/linked/2009/20100216213024_DSC_5713-Edit.jpg" width=900 height=452/><br />
<span style="color: #999999;">NIKON D70, ISO 800, ƒ/2.8, 1/30sec, 29mm focal L.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">
The photo below is the bottom view of the right-hand side frame and is attempting to illustrate how the angled attach truss is built.  This angled piece defines how much &#8220;toe&#8221; the panniers will have relative to the center-line of the bike.  If you note in the first 2 pictures of this post, the front of the panniers are wider than the back (overall, measuring outside of left pannier to outside or right pannier).  I chose not to make them parallel to the center-line of the bike in order to keep the mass as close as possible to the center-line.  If it bothers you that they are &#8220;out of square&#8221;, adjust accordingly.
</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<img src="http://foobert.com/linked/2009/20100216213140_DSC_5716-Edit.jpg" width=900 height=415/><br />
<span style="color: #999999;">NIKON D70, ISO 800, ƒ/2.8, 1/80sec, 29mm focal L.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">
And, here&#8217;s another angle showing, well, the angle! This is viewed from the back of the right-hand side frame.  </p>
<p>Also note, at the bottom of the photo you can see how the luggage &#8220;pin&#8221; rests on the square tube. Again, if you want the top of the pannier tucked in tighter, either use something beside the stock luggage peg, or use an angle stock instead of the square tube as the upper stiffener.
</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<img src="http://foobert.com/linked/2009/20100216213206_DSC_5717.jpg" width=845 height=900/><br />
<span style="color: #999999;">NIKON D70, ISO 800, ƒ/2.8, 1/15sec, 29mm focal L.</span></p>
<p>Other construction notes:</p>
<p>All parts were hand-fitted and positioned on the bike, marked, and then drilled and fastened.   I used pop rivets extensively to quickly assemble and test fit. In most cases, when I was happy with the fit, I drilled additional (larger) holes and augmented with 1/4&#8243; bolts for strength. The only joint that relies solely on pop rivets is the upper horizontal support attaching to the 2 vertical supports. </p>
<p>The astute observer might notice that the interior horizontal support (#8) is not 1.5 inch flat-stock in the photos &#8212; and you&#8217;d be correct.  I used 1&#8243; stock, but, it would be preferred to use something beefier.</p>
<p>One could easily adapt the concept to make a frame for other panniers besides the Ortlieb.</p>
<p>It was a fun project needing nothing more than a drill, hack saw (I used a sawsall), a file and some patience. All totaled up I have less than $200 in the bags and materials.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.foobert.com/blog/2009/05/21/building-pannier-hardmounts-for-a-bmw-f800/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More resources on low-power computing</title>
		<link>http://www.foobert.com/blog/2008/02/17/more-resources-on-low-power-computing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.foobert.com/blog/2008/02/17/more-resources-on-low-power-computing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 08:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Geek-Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How-To]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MythTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tuner card]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foobert.com/blog/2008/02/17/more-resources-on-low-power-computing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Via Epia mini-ITX boards are some of the lowest power around. Epiacenter.com has a power simulator  that&#8217;s good for comparing the differences in boards.</p>
<p>Although, I&#8217;ve noticed that the VB7001G board I&#8217;m using has inconsistent results on the calculator &#8212; 16.23 watts idle versus 13.92 in &#8220;network mode&#8221;.  Take it for what it&#8217;s worth.</p>
<p>While [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Via Epia mini-ITX boards are some of the lowest power around. <a href="http://www.epiacenter.com/powersim/powersim_v2/epiasimulator_v2.htm" target="_blank">Epiacenter.com has a power simulator</a>  that&#8217;s good for comparing the differences in boards.</p>
<p>Although, I&#8217;ve noticed that the VB7001G board I&#8217;m using has inconsistent results on the calculator &#8212; 16.23 watts <em>idle</em> versus 13.92 in &#8220;network mode&#8221;.  Take it for what it&#8217;s worth.</p>
<p>While I&#8217;m at it &#8212; first booted the Via VB7001G this evening. The sole purpose of this is for use as my main mail/web server as well as the mythtv backend. With a good power supply and a laptop HD for the primary (non-video) storage, I hope to have a box that idles at &lt;30 watts. Then the power hog P4 system connected to the TV would only be booted as needed.</p>
<p>Using an el&#8217;cheepo power supply and an old Maxtor HDD pulled from the shelf, it&#8217;s currently idling along at 46 W.  Not a bad start. I think there&#8217;s easily enough room for improvement to achieve the goal. Silent PC Review got their <a href="http://www.silentpcreview.com/article609-page4.html" target="_blank">EN12000 board down to 17W</a> at idle &#8212; mind you, they had a 5 W head start on me using a low-power variant of the C7 CPU  (not to mention 20% slower, and ~300% more expensive).</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a good <a href="HTS721010G9AT00" target="_blank">review of popular 2.5&#8243; notebook hard drives</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> With a <a href="http://www.mini-box.com/picoPSU-90" target="_blank">90W Pico Power supply</a>  + the tuner card and 1.25 TB of disk on-line (2 disks, one 250MB laptop, and one 3.5&#8243; 1.0 TB Western Digital Caviar Green Power drives), the box is <em><u>idling at a grand total of 25 watts (AC wall power)</u>!</em>  Mission Accomplished.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s still some room to tweak that down a bit. The 1TB drive does not need to be spun-up full time. That should drop the idle power down a few extra watts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.foobert.com/blog/2008/02/17/more-resources-on-low-power-computing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GE Adora front loading washer does not drain</title>
		<link>http://www.foobert.com/blog/2007/04/02/ge-adora-front-loading-washer-does-not-drain/</link>
		<comments>http://www.foobert.com/blog/2007/04/02/ge-adora-front-loading-washer-does-not-drain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 07:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[How-To]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maintenance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foobert.com/blog/2007/04/02/ge-adora-front-loading-washer-does-not-drain/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Just over a year ago, we bought a new G.E. Adora front loading washer (WHDVH626FWW to be exact) and, for the most part, it&#8217;s been a great unit. Very quiet except during the fastest spin cycles.</p>
<p>Twice in the last year it has stopped in the middle of a load and failed to drain the water out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just over a year ago, we bought a new G.E. Adora front loading washer (WHDVH626FWW to be exact) and, for the most part, it&#8217;s been a great unit. Very quiet except during the fastest spin cycles.</p>
<p>Twice in the last year it has stopped in the middle of a load and failed to drain the water out of drum.</p>
<p>The problem is that the drain has plugged.  There&#8217;s a coarse &#8220;screen&#8221; that traps lint and clothing, preventing them from getting into the drain pump (and thus, causing much more serious problems). Both times this has happened, there was a small article of clothing that slipped past gap at the front of the washer drum, thus finding its way into the trap and, eventually, clogging it completely.</p>
<p>The fix is remarkably simple thanks to GE placing the screen in an accessible location.</p>
<ol>
<li>First, remove the 3 screws holding the lower front panel in place.<br />
<br clear="left"/><img src="http://foobert.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/washer_front.jpg" height="752" width="500" /></li>
<li>With the front panel off, locate the lint trap as shown below.<br />
<br clear="left"/><img src="http://foobert.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/washer_drain.jpg" height="444" width="500" /></li>
<li>Place a large bowl underneath to catch the water that drains out. Note that the bowl pictured was <em>barely</em> large enough. I suggest getting a bigger one. If you don&#8217;t have the pedestal, you&#8217;ll have to be creative to find something to catch the water.</li>
<li>The drain simply threads out with normal threads (lefty loosey). It should be hand tight.  Be prepared for a fairly disgusting mess of junk to come out with the screen &#8212; lint, toothpicks, 2 (!) baby socks, etc. in my case.</li>
<li>Clean up the screen and thread it back into place. Re-install the cover and you&#8217;re done.</li>
</ol>
<p>I&#8217;ve found that leading up to the wash load stopping without draining, that the wash times get much longer than normal &#8212; like 3 hours.  So, if you&#8217;ve determined that the cycle length is too long you probably have a partially plugged screen that the washer is struggling with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.foobert.com/blog/2007/04/02/ge-adora-front-loading-washer-does-not-drain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>73</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

